Singing and Senioring
Go check out Kon's newest Kolumn. He's happy and exciting and loving life. And now there are two females in his life, the newest being his baby Annika.
Last spring I went to a choir concert, a farewell for the choir teacher at LBCC. I got to sing under him for 2 or 3 years, and those were some of the coolest musical experiences of my life. I listened to that choir sing, and boy, I wanted to be back there, singing. I wanted to be singing in a choir like that so badly! I wanted my soul to be rockin' in the bosom of Abraham, and listening, from stage, to the sopranos going, "La-la-la-LA-la, la-la-LA-a-a, la-la-la-la-LA-la..."
Well, it's the end of the first week of the term, the choir teacher's back for a swan song, and they are in desperate need of male singers. Even more than that, they are desperate for tenors. They rehearse Tues & Thur from 11-1. Incredibly, I don't have class until late Tuesday/Thursday afternoon. Theoretically I could do it.
But I'm freaked out, of fourteen credits, 12+ work-hours, AND 4 hours of choir practice? Will I have time for anything else?
And another thing I'm freaked out about. For Senior Project, we had to submit three ideas by Thursday. One of the prof's sent us an e-mail telling us the tentative decisions they had made on our projects. Dude, for our team, he picked my idea, one that could be very, very cool, but also seems very, very risky to me, for a couple reasons. The project is to try to optimize crop mix for grass seed farmers. This is a complex decision they have to make, up to five or ten years in advance, and the idea is that after consulting with a farmer or four, we can get a good idea of the things that go into this decision, quantify that information, and construct a model that allows the power of formal optimization to work for them.
The "couple reasons." First, man, I don't know a lot about this. I talked to a farmer and he told me a little about some of the factors that go into this decision. I don't know if it's a complex enough decision for the methods we're learning to be of any value. You know, we can't improve an obvious, no-brain decision. But then, by nature we will know relatively little about these projects going in. And the decision could be complicated enough. And it would be really cool to do some substantial work in an area that I have a little background in.
Secondly, there's a pride issue at work. I've heard too many disparaging comments in farmer circles or church circles about college or academic hotshots that had their ideas and who really weren't helpful or successful in the common sense areas that farming or maintenance work are. I don't want to be laughed at or not taken seriously or talked about behind my back. "Oh, yeah, you shoulda seen those kids. They came out all serious and talked to me for a long time, and then I got this report, and it's full of nothing but technical jargon and the results aren't anything I didn't know anyways."
I wonder if it will be difficult to get a farmer (or more than one farmer) to really get into a project like this. I just don't think they're the kind that would embrace strange, technical support in their decision-making, from a group of non-farmer, college students no less. But then, once we're convinced of the legitimacy of the project, we would need to work hard to construct a model that closely mimics reality by talking to farmers. If we do that, then our results should be legitimate, and probably helpful, provided my first concern is not an issue.

